If a proven, evidence-based program cannot be fully implemented, what is the best course of action?

When a proven, evidence-based program cannot be fully implemented, consulting with the program's developers to determine potential impact is the most effective course of action. Engaging with the developers allows practitioners to gain insights into essential program components and the rationale behind them. This understanding is crucial because evidence-based programs are designed with specific methodologies and outcomes in mind; deviations from these may compromise their effectiveness.

By consulting with the developers, practitioners can discuss which elements of the program are vital for achieving desired outcomes and which might be adaptable. This approach helps maintain the program’s integrity while making necessary adjustments, ensuring that any implementation still has a better chance of effectively addressing the needs of the target population. Additionally, developers may provide guidance or resources that could facilitate a more faithful implementation even with constraints.

Other options, while they may seem viable, either disregard the foundational principles that make the program effective or could lead to incomplete implementations that lack a clear understanding of the program's critical components. Consulting with the developers stands out as the most informed and strategic approach to navigating the challenges of partial implementation.